The article is titled, “ Sweet Science of Seduction or Scam? Evaluating eHarmony” and the following expert questions the validity of eHarmony’s claims: ![]() In 2014, an article in CSI – The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, sought further clarification from eHarmony on its scientific claims. Possible conflict of interest aside, attacks against eHarmony for its scientific claims aren’t new. It remains to be seen if the full episode expands its attacks to equally include IAC-owned properties. The clip they released early launches a scathing attack against eHarmony while barely touching IAC-owned dating services. CollegeHumor is owned by IAC, which also owns, , Plenty of Fish, OKCupid, and eight other online dating services. ![]() Here is a clip from Season 2, Episode 4 airing on August 1, 2017.Īdam Ruins Everything Clip – Why Dating Sites Aren’t Scientific at AllĪdam Ruins Everything is produced by CollegeHumor. SEE ALSO: 33,000 eHarmony Marriages a Year But in the interest of avoiding a larger controversy, the show discloses that the production company that produces Adam Ruins Everything is associated with the parent company of and OKCupid. Adam Ruins Everything launches an attack against eHarmony and its founder in the episode. ![]() N Engl J Med 2005 352:1550-1556April 14, 2005DOI: 10.The TruTV show, Adam Ruins Everything, is controversially tackling the subject of “online dating.” Season 2, Episode 4, airing on Tuesday, is titled, “Adam Ruins Dating.” The episode seeks to debunk sites that use scientific methods for matchmaking, the biggest being. Mannix, M.D., David Wypij, Ph.D., Bryce A. Source: Hyponatremia among Runners in the Boston MarathonĬhristopher S.D. Does anyone have another study, more information, or a better explaination of why that would make sense? TLDR: Adam's football episode lumps water and sport drinks into a broad category of "fluids" and states over consumption will cause hyponatremia, contrary to what sport drinks are designed to do (replenish salts). Does anyone have another study, more information, or an explanation to validate this dismissive classification of water and sports drinks reduced to just "fluids"? Like, if a person drank 100% sport drink, they would not find themselves to be hyponatremic at the end of the race.įor the hypothesis to include hypotonic fluids, specifically as a suspected cause and the results to dismiss this by simply stating, "There were no differences between the runners with and those without hyponatremia in age, composition of fluid consumed, or self-reports of water loading and use of NSAIDs", makes me more curious about their methods to rule it out. It seems, if controlled for total fluid intake for the runners instead of brushing over the topic, the study may have came up with different results. It fails to mention the content of the total fluid intake. ![]() The study the show cites seems to discount sports drinks as a solution to hyponatremia because "findings suggest that the contribution of the type of fluid is small as compared with the volume of fluid ingested". Has anyone else found this show's explaination of hyponatremia and it's relation to drink companies lacking? Over consummation of water can definitely cause hyponatremia, but sports drinks (I thought) specifically negate that, and there was no differentiation between the two mentioned in the show.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |